Subject	False - they are in fact "similar" (n/m)
Posted by	ConVerTT on July 02, 2009 at 1:21 PM
	This message has been viewed 42 times.
In Reply To	they are dissimilar (n/m) posted by ubermiach on July 02, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Upper Fan Shrouds TT vs. NA - Graphx007 11:36:17 07/02/09 they are not the same - aliaZ 11:47:00 07/02/09 they are different. (n/m) - Guapo 11:56:03 07/02/09 they are not equal (n/m) - RSR 12:14:33 07/02/09 They do not match up. (n/m) - Summeronthechain (MN) 12:23:46 07/02/09 They are eachothers opposite (n/m) - dawhip 14:00:37 07/02/09 They are overpriced is wha they are! (n/m) - SkiFly01 12:29:52 07/02/09 =/= (n/m) - johnnysombrero 12:31:22 07/02/09 they are dissimilar (n/m) - ubermiach 12:57:16 07/02/09 False - they are in fact "similar" (n/m) - ConVerTT 13:21:17 07/02/09 they are not interchangable (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 13:01:12 07/02/09 They are homologous :) (n/m) - ConVerTT 13:20:04 07/02/09 they don't compute (n/m) - Gizmo 13:46:45 07/02/09 They are two peas from different pods (n/m) - na300zx (OH) 13:50:25 07/02/09 Apples to Oranges. (n/m) - Josher 14:05:24 07/02/09 Is there another way to say it. I am not sure I understand. (n/m) - MrPulldown 14:37:10 07/02/09 These are not the droids you're looking for. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 16:56:35 07/02/09 they are incongruent (n/m) - gt300zxtt 17:52:30 07/02/09 They are opposed to a proposition. (n/m) - Timatoad Lemonload(OK) 18:49:10 07/02/09 They are unique - PartsPeddler 04:17:28 07/03/09 They are incongruous (n/m) - GatorJ 20:38:35 07/03/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.